Resources: Reviewing a vendor risk assessment
Each link below was checked this session and loads.
21 CFR 606.171 — Cornell Legal Information Institute — the full “Reporting of product deviations” section, including paragraph (a), this module’s contrast clause: a party performing a manufacturing, holding, or distribution step under a blood establishment’s control is reached directly by the regulation; a software vendor generally isn’t. Local verbatim copy:
sources/cfr/606.171.md.21 CFR 11.10 — Cornell Legal Information Institute — the full “Controls for closed systems” section, including the introductory sentence this module reuses: the obligation to control a system sits on “persons who use” it, not its vendor. Local verbatim copy:
sources/cfr/11.10.md.GovInfo: Code of Federal Regulations — the government’s own dated, authenticated CFR collection. Use this when a citation needs to be tied to a specific published edition rather than the current rolling text Cornell’s LII shows.
AABB: Updated Quality Systems Essentials — AABB’s current landing page on the QSE (Quality System Essentials) structure, including Suppliers and Customers (QSE 4), the theme this module draws on for qualifying and managing a vendor. Use it as a starting point; see
sources/aabb/qse-framework.mdfor what’s confirmed and what still needs re-checking before citing a specific edition.AICPA & CIMA: System and Organization Controls (SOC) Suite of Services — the body that maintains the SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) framework this module names but deliberately doesn’t teach the mechanics of. Use it only for what a SOC 2 report is, as background for later — reading what a specific report actually says is
vendor-and-third-party-risk-management’s job, not this module’s.